のまりんの資料棚

アクセスカウンタ

zoom RSS Report of Committee on the Rights of Child T

<<   作成日時 : 2010/08/01 17:00   >>

ブログ気持玉 0 / トラックバック 4 / コメント 0

Report of Committee on the Rights of Child in Geneva T
On 27th 〜28th May of 2010 

1 Making a partial amendment of The Civil law
A new law was passed, and some articles and a policy were planned and under consideration by authorities in Japan, but people don’t know about it. The law that was already passed on 1st April of 2010 is ‘Supporting Children and Young People Law’.

The articles that are considered now are ‘Children Fundamental Law’, ‘Making a partial amendment of The Civil law for equality of legitimate children and illegitimate children’, and ‘making a partial amendment of the civil law for increasing the age from that the children can agree to have sex with someone in Japan.’

The policy under the consideration is establishment of ‘Ministry of Children and Families’.

The articles and policy are very dangerous and trifling. In ‘Supporting Children and Young People Law’, ‘young people’ in their 30’s. So, Japanese young men and young women can live on money that are given by the administration. Until 40 years old, people that don’t have the will to work can live more easily than the people that work hard.

And the institutions that are entrusted to care for the children by the Children Welfare Consultation Office can confine the young people until they become 40 years old.

Those law, articles, and policy will create the employment for the radical left group and give them the budget.

About ‘Making a partial amendment of The Civil law for equality of legitimate children and illegitimate children’, this amendment will destroy a lot of Japanese families. In the conference of the Committee on the Rights of Child in Geneva, the representative of Japanese Ministry of Justice said;
“The difference between legitimate children and illegitimate children on the inherited property are recognized in Japan.
The legitimate children were given better treatment than illegitimate children on the inherited property to protect the official marriage in law.”

Now, in Japan, if the parent passes a way, only the children from that marriage can inherit money and property.

If other children, from other affairs, are belonging to the parents, they can receive about 1/3 of the inheritance. They must have proof that the passed away person was their parent. In this case, the other children must have their parents name on their birth certificate to gain any inheritance.

The new law, could enable the other children to receive 50% of the in heritance. The valued marriage system will change with this new law.

Besides, some of the feminists want to get ‘the rights of argument about the child’s blood line’ the Japanese women. What is ‘the rights of argument about the children’s blood line’?

In Japan, the man can refuse to acknowledge a child as his own. But, if this law will be approved, a man will have to acknowledge a child as his own without evidence in the court, when the woman (that is not his wife) says;
“You are the father of this child.”
May be, even if they didn’t make love, this man will have to acknowledge. And then this woman’s child will have the rights of the inheritance equally with the man’s legitimate children. So, the man’s family will be broken.

Why will the man have to acknowledge without evidence?
Now, in Japan, it is approved that the man that used Domestic Violence on his wife with no evidence and with no investigation in the court.

Even if his wife ran around brandishing a kitchen knife, the man must receive the protect order and he can’t see his children. And the family will be broken.

So, ‘Making a partial amendment of The Civil Law for equality of legitimate children and illegitimate children’ and ‘the rights of argument about the children’s blood line’ will break up many Japanese families.

In addition, there are a lot of serious problem for the foreign women. Many foreign women come to Japan, from the Philippines, China, South Korea, and South American countries, etc.

These women have a purpose to get a lot of money. They work in the bars or nightclubs or sex-related businesses. Soon after they get husbands or boyfriends, and the women get money from the husbands and boy friends.

The women have babies without fail, because they can live in Japan with the children who have a Japanese father. Japanese men believe their foreign wives’ words;
“This is your child.”
But, in many cases, these women’s words are doubtful.

These foreign women know about the DV Law very well. May be, the wedding brokers teach them about the DV Law. Often they escape from their husbands using DV Law with the children to find another man who has a lot of money and send money to their father and mother in the country where the women were born.

These foreign women will bring the children to the Japanese man, and will say;
“This is your child."


2 The members of Committee on the Rights of Child questioned about gender and DV Law.

One of the Committee members asked a question about DV Law. The Law was changed 2 times in the past. May be, the report from the Japanese government doesn’t say about the amendment of the DV Law.

About DV (domestic violence), may be, the report of Japanese government says;
“A lot of Japanese Women are given DV by their husbands.”
The Japanese report was written under the effect of the NGO groups that are advocating feminism.

The feminists in Japan work on appeal to combine the DV Law with the Stalker Law. The DV (domestic violence) Law applies to married couple. The Stalker Law applies to unmarried couple. The feminists want general people to think that there is no difference between ‘married’ and ‘unmarried’.
The feminists want to erase ‘marriage’ or ‘marriage system’ from the earth.

The feminists’ persistence is strong. They are also making an effort to make a new law:
‘Prohibition Against Sexual Violence Law’.
The definition of the violence is not clearly, so, ‘Prohibition Against Sexual Violence Law’ will be terrible.

Well, I reason that after the combination of the DV Law and the Stalker Law, the feminists will try to combine the combination of DV・Stalker Law with The Anti Prostitution Law.

Because the kinds of violence against women are the following;
Rape, DV (domestic violence), Stalker, Molesting, Sexual Harassment, Trafficking, and Prostitution.

These kinds of violence are given official approval on the ‘Gender-Equal Society Fundamental Law’ and on the United Nations instrument. And the feminists say that all kinds of violence against women are crime. But, Prostitution is not violence. If the woman is forced to prostitute, it is a crime.

However, the feminists say these kinds of violence are crime. So, I think they will try to combine DV・Stalker Law with The Anti Prostitution Law. In other words, the feminists think that ‘marriage’ equal ‘prostitution’, and they try to generalize all kinds of relationship between man and women as crime.

DV is the another name of marriage, Stalker is another name of boyfriend and girlfriend, Molesting is another name of man and woman in the train or on the road, Sexual Harassment is another name of man and woman in the working place.

Well, about the prostitution, in the Committee on the Rights of Child, Japanese delegate of Justice Ministry said that only men are arrested by police, and women are not arrested. Bur, there are many cases that the women want to prostitute themselves. It is not gender equal that only men are arrested.

This is not gender equality.

In the conference in Geneva, one of the members of the Committee on the Rights of Child, asked this question;
“In Japan, are children treated carefully when they are interviewed about sensitive sexual harassment? ”

And another member said;
“Not only the girls but boys also suffered from sexual harm, but in Japan, the administration takes the policies of sexual harm for girls only.

I could confirm that the activists of children rights and the activists of feminism join hands to each other. One of the members of the Committee said;
“If many nurseries are made by the administration and the families are not so good, the children are not happy.”
These words are normal. But, ‘Happy Families’ means families that has good surroundings so that husband and wife can work knowing their children are safe.

But, normal thinking about ‘Happy Families’ is the following;
‘The children can live with their mother and father.
The mother and father has a good relationship.
The children love and respect their parents.
Their parents and children have good relationship with the children’s grandfathers and grandmothers or another relatives.
The father and mother can get the income and the family can livewell.
The parents and the children can be regular in their life.
The parents take care of their children very well.
The children can study at school.’

Committee on the Rights of Child in Geneva didn’t have the thinking of “How to make good family”.

テーマ

注目テーマ 一覧


月別リンク

ブログ気持玉

クリックして気持ちを伝えよう!
ログインしてクリックすれば、自分のブログへのリンクが付きます。
→ログインへ

トラックバック(4件)

タイトル (本文) ブログ名/日時
プラダ メンズ
Report of Committee on the Rights of Child T のまりんの資料棚/ウェブリブログ ...続きを見る
プラダ メンズ
2013/07/06 23:14
プラダ トート
Report of Committee on the Rights of Child T のまりんの資料棚/ウェブリブログ ...続きを見る
プラダ トート
2013/07/07 10:32
プラダ 財布
Report of Committee on the Rights of Child T のまりんの資料棚/ウェブリブログ ...続きを見る
プラダ 財布
2013/07/08 02:56
プラダ バッグ
Report of Committee on the Rights of Child T のまりんの資料棚/ウェブリブログ ...続きを見る
プラダ バッグ
2013/07/08 03:50

トラックバック用URL help


自分のブログにトラックバック記事作成(会員用) help

タイトル
本 文

コメント(0件)

内 容 ニックネーム/日時

コメントする help

ニックネーム
本 文
Report of Committee on the Rights of Child T のまりんの資料棚/BIGLOBEウェブリブログ
文字サイズ:       閉じる